Fechar

%0 Conference Proceedings
%4 sid.inpe.br/marte2/2017/10.27.12.25.53
%2 sid.inpe.br/marte2/2017/10.27.12.25.54
%@isbn 978-85-17-00088-1
%F 59532
%T Comparativo entre no processamento de dados GNSS por Posicionamento Relativo Estático e Ponto Preciso (PPP)
%D 2017
%A Chicati, Marcelo Luiz,
%A Nanni, Marcos Rafael,
%A Chicati, Mônica Sacioto,
%A Cezar, Everson,
%A Oliveira, Roney Berti de,
%@electronicmailaddress mlchicati@hotmail.com
%E Gherardi, Douglas Francisco Marcolino,
%E Aragão, Luiz Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de,
%B Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 18 (SBSR)
%C Santos
%8 28-31 maio 2017
%I Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%J São José dos Campos
%P 1770-1775
%S Anais
%1 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%X The GNSS system has been used extensively for surveying and densification of geodetic networks, leasing and monitoring of engineering works, registry surveys, among other services. Due to its precision and accuracy, the GNSS survey has become widely used for registry topographic surveys for urban and farming areas. Thus, the main objective of this work was to compare the use of the Static Relative Positioning method and the Accurate Positioning Point (IBGE), according to the requirement of the Technical Regulation of Georeferencing of Rural Property (INCRA, 3rd ed., 2013) For the accomplishment of the service of Georeferencing of Rural Property the INCRA Georeferencing Technical Standard specifies that positional accuracy values, situated as artificial limits, should be accurate to 0.50 m or greater. However, the study analyzed the results obtained in a specific study area located in the municipality of Sarandi on State of Paraná, analyzing results of processing property boundary vertices and verifying the values of positional accuracy to verify if they were within the acceptable standard limit by the norm in force. It is concluded at the end of the tests that the Static Relative Positioning method was the most favorable to be used because of the absolute positional precision results greater.
%9 Mapeamento
%@language pt
%3 59532.pdf


Fechar